New Brevoort Formspring

  • ask me anything
  • submit a post
  • rss
  • archive
  • Tom, you guys are always quick to point out that the Diamond monthly lists are not the actual numbers for sales and such, but you guys are also quick to celebrate when issues are very high on those lists. So are those things always wrong, or are they something to watch?
    Anonymous

    They’re not something to watch in terms of working out exactly how many copies of a particular book have been sold, or whether a title is profitable or not. But they do give a broad indication of how well the books are doing as compared to one another. For example, it is entirely possible for the sales on, say, CAPTAIN AMERICA, to go up, but for the ranking of CAPTAIN AMERICA on those charts to go down–it all depends on how many other titles were released that month and how well all of them did. So those standings are just relative to one another in a given month, they can’t even be accurately tracked from month to month, in a “CAP was at #2 last month and now it’s at #4, the sky is falling!” sort of a way–because that book at #4 may have sold more copies. And as I tell my editors, the only number that counts is the number of copies that you sell.

    • November 15, 2013 (9:33 am)
    • 4 notes
    1. rasmusskovlykke liked this
    2. rjbailey reblogged this from brevoortformspring
    3. rjbailey liked this
    4. brevoortformspring posted this
© 2013–2023 New Brevoort Formspring