New Brevoort Formspring

  • ask me anything
  • submit a post
  • rss
  • archive
  • Hi, just a question from a thing that always I found strange considering how were developed some characters, even the minors. Do you think that from all the Marvel characters from the 60s, Amora the Enchantress is who clearly need a bit more of development and depth? Always I loved Amora, she is really a very wonderful character that needs a bit more of exposure and story. Her story never was explained in any way and I think she is one of the most important asgardians.
    carl0s0ter0oo1

    Now you’re just messing with me, aren’t you?

    • May 10, 2013 (9:41 am)
    • 4 notes
    1. carlosjdrew liked this
    2. carl0s0ter0oo1 liked this
    3. battledoll liked this
    4. carl0s0ter0oo1 said: No, simply I believe considering the development of a lot of characters from the 60s that she is one of the characters from that era that never had a following story and because of that I think that she needs more depth and complexity.
    5. brevoortformspring posted this
© 2013–2023 New Brevoort Formspring