When people speak about things, they are not didactic about what they’re speaking about, nor do they quote chapter-and-verse like an encyclopedia entry. if they did, you would have told me who wrote and drew CAP #296-300 and the conditions under which you purchased and read them.
Again, continuity is a tool, it is not the purpose of these stories. if it was relevant to reference that particular CAP story in that moment then we would have done so. But as it was not, we did not, Steve did not. He’s a person, not a bad wikipedia entry.
carlosjdrew liked this